DCPLive is a blog by library staff at the DeKalb County Public Library!
Jun 15 2012

ShareReads: The Art of Tearing Up

by Jimmy L

ShareReads intro

Admit it, we’ve all cried at the movies. Many have cried at the end of a book. And some may have even cried at the cancellation of their favorite TV show (OK, so I’m stretching the category a bit here). But how many of us have cried in front of a painting in a museum? That is the subject of a book I recently borrowed from the library purely because I found its unconventional subject matter intriguing. It’s called Pictures & Tears: A History of People Who Have Cried in Front of Paintings by James Elkins. Elkins claims that we have lost touch with our emotional reaction to paintings, and whereas previous generations had a highly emotional relationship with art, the past 100 years of art history have been the driest in terms of tear-duct/facial interaction.

One of the things I loved about this book is that it is a non-academic humanist look at art history by an academic. Elkins wrestles with the idea of art criticism caught between intellectual distance and emotional investment, and wonders if the two approaches had to be mutually exclusive. Are they not both valid? Time and again he runs into the problem where other academics and art historians simply wouldn’t talk to him. And many of them who did talk to him wanted to remain anonymous so as not to ruin their credibility. He constantly heard the following reaction, slightly paraphrased by me: “Crying (and other more base human reactions) are not a proper way of interacting with art. In fact, the phenomenon doesn’t even deserve to be studied.”

"Olive Trees with Yellow Sky and Sun" by Van Gogh

But study it he does. Being an academic, Elkins has loved paintings for all sorts of reasons, but has never cried in front of one himself. So the phenomenon is not foreign to him, but at the same time he is too knowledgeable in art history for a painting to catch him unaware in that welling-up-weepy way. So he decides to ask other (normal-ler) people: “What paintings (if any) have you cried in front of, and why (or why not)?”

I won’t go into them here, but it turns out there are many reasons, and some of them are enlightening while others not so much. Though not perfect by any means, I really enjoyed this book because of its unconventional treatment of its subject. Another book comes to my mind when speaking of books that think outside the box, Freakonomics (though I could write a whole blog post on why I disliked that book). To this end, I will pose a question: “What books have you read that treat a subject in a completely new or unconventional way?” Alternately, you may also answer Elkin’s question: “What paintings (if any) have you cried in front of, and why (or why not)?”

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Ev July 3, 2012 at 9:41 AM

I have cried in front of a painting, Irises by Vincent van Gogh. Yes I know it’s essentially a picture of flowers. But I think to him, and at the time to me, it was a painting of hope. He painted Irises and several other natural studies while he was at a mental asylum. He was studying nature in his hopes to find a way to cope with life and sanity. At least that’s what the painting says to me.

Let me tell you, the painting looks very different when you get up close and personal. You can see the layers of paint, the ridges left by the brush. The emotions of van Gogh seem to leap up from the paint and canvas. To see a print, it’s just a pretty picture. So if you ever get to see a van Gogh in real life, go for it!

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: